来源/作者：【2019/05/20 符芳侨 Hu Pang Chaw FB】
方天兴：关中生报考统考案判决 或面对灾难性后果
《谢谢方天兴阁下》
弱弱的问一声，德高望重的方天兴阁下：
1. 关中当前的官方法定地位是什么 ？
A. 独中 B. 私立中学
2. 关中当前的官方法定教学媒介语是
A. 中文 B. 马来文
3. 关中是否有列在教育法令规定的60所独中内
A. 有 B. 没有
4. 关中生报考统考是否需要，教育部属下的考试局发文批准
A. 需要 B. 不需要
最后问题：
独中生报考统考 ，是否需要董总批准
A. 需要 B. 不需要
附加题：两个“如果 ”，您可以选择不答
“如果”独中生报考统考不需要董总的批准 ，那董总是否有权利拒绝独中生报考统考
A. 有权拒绝 B. 无权拒绝
“如果” 董总有权拒绝 ，哪是根据哪一个法令或条规行事 ？
还希望推动成立关中，居功不小的方天兴阁下 ，拨冗回答。
作为一个小市民的我 ，冒昧提出问题 ，还希望您大人大量，明察秋毫，可以为我解惑。
感激不尽 ！
来源/作者：【2019/05/18 Siti Kasim FB】
ON MASZLEE AND QUOTA IN EDUCATION
—— Race-based affirmative action is failing poor Malaysians
Maszlee,
I am shocked to see this video clip of you. You speak as if
all of the non-bumis are rich therefore the quota must remain. You gave example
the difference between public and private universities. You said the private
universities are mostly filled with non-bumis because they are better off than
the Malays. I can't believe this is coming out from our Education Minister!!!
It is not true all non-bumis are rich therefore the quotas
must remain to enable the Bumis to compete on an equal footing. Not only you
are insulting the many hard-working Malay parents who do not rely on government
handouts but also to the Malays in general to compete on their own merit.
Figures provided by Parliament in 2015, showed that
Bumiputera households make up the majority of the country's top 20 percent
income earners (T20), but the community also sees the widest intra-group income
disparity. According to data from a parliamentary written reply, the bumiputera
make up 53.81 percent of the T20 category, followed by Chinese at 37.05
percent, Indians at 8.80 percent and others at 0.34 percent.
However, when the comparison is made within the bumiputera
group itself, T20 earners only comprise 16.34 percent. The remaining comprises
the middle 40 percent income earners (M40) at 38.96 percent and the bottom 40
percent income earners (B40) making up the majority at 44.7 percent. Why is
this? You should look into this disparity instead of pointing fingers to other
Malaysians who work hard to uplift themselves without any help from their own
government.
This is in contrast with the Chinese and Indian communities,
where the M40 group makes up the majority. Within the Chinese community, the
T20 group makes up 29.66 percent, followed by the M40 group at 42.32 percent
and B40 at 28.02 percent. As for the Indian community, the T40 group stands at
19.98 percent, followed by the M40 income earners at 41.31 percent and the B40
at 38.71 percent.
Why do the private universities are filled with non-bumis
for a very simple reason because they can't afford to send their children to
overseas universities. Most if not all of the scholarships are given to Bumis.
They can't gain entry to public universities due to the quotas despite having
better results than Bumis. Where do you expect them to go then Maszlee? I know
of many non-bumis who are scraping their barrels to ensure they send their kids
to further their studies either local or overseas. Many of them have less
children because they know they will have to pay for their kid's education in
the future.
I am one of the parent that send my daughter to study in the
International local university. I have to borrow money to pay for my daughter's
university fees. I am lucky I have a kind Chinese client who takes pity on me
and gave me a loan without interest to pay for my daughter's education. This is
because he thinks education is important. I struggled to ensure I keep up the
payment and with God's will, I paid up the loan. I am sure many non-bumi
parents do the same as me through their Chinese associations, banks, etc... because
they cannot get any help from their own government.
In any event, I think my fellow non-Bumi Malaysians don't
despair, Maszlee can stuff his matriculation quotas as doing STPM is equivalent
to A-Level and more marketable to any local or overseas universities.
By the way your claim that the foreign university branches
in Malaysia is filled up by non-bumis as somehow the reason Malays need more
places in public universities via matriculation is a boldface lie. Monash was
opened in KL in 1998 and Nottingham in 2000; matriculation as you said started
in 1999. I cannot believe that you are the Minister of Education. Where did you
learn to lie like this? Joseph Goebbels?
Schemes favouring Malays were once deemed essential to
improve the lot of Malaysia’s least wealthy racial group; but as can be seen
this scheme is to help the well-off within the Malay group, while failing the
poor. Yet affirmative action persists because it is a reliable vote-winner for
these politicians.
#bangkit Melayu
#menteritaklayak
来源/作者：【2019/05/20 符芳侨 Hu Pang Chaw FB】
《大马需要更多Siti Kasim ! 》
Siti Kasim, 一位敢怒敢言 ，敢于说真话的女律师，放眼大马 ，还有谁可以与她相比的 ？
我欣赏她的真诚 ，不造作，勇敢的为被打压的低下层社会发言，争取应得权益。
针对闹的沸腾腾的土著与非土著进入大专和大学预科班问题 ，她说出了非土著心里的话。
大马社会需要更多的Siti
Kasim, 为社会不公现象、为政治领导人的失言 ，政府的不当措施 ，发言纠正，为无助的一群争权益。
来源/作者：【2019/05/19 张丹枫 FB】
人权律师茜蒂屌得好！
马智礼说华人都有钱所以把孩子送入私立大学。茜蒂站出来为华人抱不平：《那都是被你们的种族固打制逼的！他们的成绩比马来人优越，却被你们挡在大学校门外，又没钱出国深造，只能砸锅卖铁筹钱给孩子进入本地私立大专学校，不然你觉得他们还能去哪里？》
茜蒂痛斥马智礼满脑子种族主义思想。《我真不敢相信，这样蠢笨的话竟然会从你口中说出来！马智礼，你已经让那些决意不靠政府特权与金钱资助而勤奋苦学的马来年轻人蒙羞！也令许多不跟政府贷款而自己打拼创业赚钱的马来企业家无地自容！》
